International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Purpose: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) presents heterogeneous recurrence patterns and variable outcomes following salvage radiotherapy (sRT). We evaluated clinicopathologic determinants of PSMA-PET/CT detection, anatomical recurrence distribution, and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) following PSMA-PET-guided sRT. Methods: This retrospective single-institution study included 140 patients with BCR after RP who underwent Ga-PSMA-PET/CT prior to sRT with or without androgen deprivation therapy. PSMA-PET-positive findings were categorized as prostate bed only (PBO) or pelvic nodal involvement with or without the prostate bed (PLNI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards models were employed. Results: PSMA-PET detected locoregional recurrence in 77/140 patients (55%). On multivariable analysis, PSA at recurrence (OR=2.07; p=0.003) and age (OR=1.07; p=0.016) were the sole independent predictors of PSMA-PET positivity. ROC analysis yielded AUC=0.74 (optimal threshold of 0.58 ng/mL). Among PSMA-positive patients, PBO was associated with a longer time to BCR (tBCR) (37.5 versus 15 months; p=0.006). Seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and pT-stage predicted PLNI on univariable analysis. Among 124 of 140 evaluable patients (median follow-up 31 months), estimated bDFS at 24, 36, and 60 months was 89.7%, 80.2%, and 54.1%, respectively. SVI (HR=2.39; p=0.031), EPE (HR=2.82; p=0.012), pT-stage (HR=1.64; p=0.021), and pN-stage (HR=1.83; p=0.045) were associated with increased failure on univariable Cox regression, though none retained independent significance. Conclusion: PSA burden and age independently predicted PSMA-PET detection. Recurrence patterns reflected disease behavior, as PBO was associated with longer tBCR. Adverse pathologic features were associated with pelvic nodal disease and reduced biochemical control; none remained independently predictive.

Purpose: To evaluate whether visually assessed high-quality prostate MRI, as defined by the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) scoring system, is sufficient to ensure consistent AI model performance, or whether hidden acquisition-related technical effects introduce variability that cannot be detected through visual inspection. Methods: This retrospective study included 568 bpMRI scans from seven institutions, classified using PI-QUAL v2 into high-quality (scores 2-3) and low-quality (score 1) groups. Quantitative image quality features were extracted using MRQy from T2w and ADC sequences. Three experiments were conducted on high-quality scans: (1) unsupervised clustering to identify hidden technical batch effects; (2) V-Net models (M) for prostate capsule segmentation on T2w using single-cluster and balanced multi-cluster training strategies; and (3) VoxelMorph-based deformable registration (M2) to align ADC maps to T2w images. Performance metrics included DSC, precision, recall, volume ratio, HD95, ASSD, and TRE. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed cross-cluster variability, Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) evaluated performance equivalence, and bootstrap resampling quantified training efficiency. Results: Clustering identified four clusters among 277 high-quality bpMRI scans. Single-cluster models showed variable performance (DSC=0.41-0.85) with significant batch effects (p<0.001), even with 140 training samples. The balanced multi-cluster model (n=60) eliminated batch effects (p=0.075), achieved equivalent performance (p<0.001), and demonstrated 2.23-fold greater training efficiency despite using 2.3-fold fewer samples. Registration performance also varied significantly across clusters (TRE=0.86-5.47 mm, p<0.001). Conclusion: Acquisition-related batch effects significantly impact AI generalizability in prostate MRI, even among high-quality scans. Quantitative clustering enables detection of technical variations and supports diversity-aware training strategies that achieve equivalent performance with 2.3-fold fewer samples while eliminating batch effects.

Background and Objective: Adding belzutifan to adjuvant pembrolizumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) in LITESPARK-022, but its durability beyond the 1-year treatment is unknown. Methods: Following a registered plan, we reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves of ten phase 3 adjuvant renal cell carcinoma trials. Within each trial, we estimated restricted mean survival time differences ({Delta}RMST), hazard ratios (HRs) before and after planned treatment ended, and DFS differences. Key Findings and Limitations: In LITESPARK-022 (central review), the 24-month {Delta}RMST was 1.34 months (95% confidence interval 0.73-1.95), and the belzutifan arm remained ahead after month 12 ({Delta}RMST increment 0.74 months/yr, 0.32-1.19). The HR was 0.55 (0.43-0.71) before month 12 and 1.16 (0.87-1.54) afterwards (post/pre ratio 2.10); investigator assessment showed similar attenuation. Similar ratios occurred in KEYNOTE-564 at its first interim analysis (2.02), whose benefit persisted, and in SORCE and PROTECT (2.09, 2.59), whose benefit faded. From months 12 to 30 (post hoc), the DFS difference changed by -3.7 percentage points (-8.1 to 0.8) with central review and 0.6 (-4.0 to 5.0) with investigator assessment. Data were reconstructed, and follow-up was short. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Relative hazard reductions with belzutifan were greater before month 12; durability of the absolute DFS advantage is uncertain and assessment-dependent, so single-HR projections should be avoided.

Purpose To assess whether follow-up MRI, biopsy status, and timing of cribriform disease detection predict active surveillance (AS) failure in a contemporary transatlantic cohort. Materials and Methods. Retrospective MRI-driven AS cohort of 619 men at two academic centers (UK/USA), 2012-2024. Primary outcome: AS failure (disease-specific mortality, metastasis, grade group [GG] [&ge;]4 progression, or post-treatment biochemical recurrence). Key exposures: final MRI and biopsy status, timing of cribriform [&ge;]GG2 detection. Cumulative incidence was derived; independent predictors used multivariable Fine-Gray models. Results. Over median follow-up of 6.4 years, 39/619 men (6%) experienced AS failure. Cribriform [&ge;]GG2 was detected in 82/619 (13%) on follow-up biopsy versus 24/619 (4%) at baseline, comparably in baseline GG1 (10%) and non-cribriform GG2 (9%), and only in MRI-visible tumors. Three-year AS failure after final biopsy was 31% in men with cribriform [&ge;]GG2 versus 0-2% with stable or non-cribriform disease; 44% of failures had stable MRI. On Fine-Gray analysis, cribriform [&ge;]GG2 was the only independent predictor of AS failure in re-biopsied men (SHR 30; 95% CI 5.2-167; P<0.001); no type of MRI progression category was independently predictive. Among 595 men cribriform-negative at baseline, 6-year AS failure after a second biopsy was 34% if cribriform [&ge;]GG2 was detected versus 7% if still cribriform-negative. Conclusions. Cribriform status at follow-up biopsy independently predicts AS failure, whereas MRI progression does not. The three-fold higher cribriform prevalence at follow-up likely reflects baseline sampling error. Because newly detected cribriform tumours were exclusively MRI-visible, early repeat biopsy of patients with MRI-visible disease may considerably improve risk stratification.

Background: Although perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) is the standard neoadjuvant regimen for resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, evidence describing treatment delivery in routine clinical practice remains limited, particularly regarding relative dose intensity (RDI) and treatment completion. Objectives: To evaluate real-world delivery of preoperative FLOT chemotherapy, including treatment completion, progression to surgery, RDI, toxicity and exploratory changes in estimated lean body mass (LBM). Methods: A retrospective single-centre service evaluation included consecutive patients receiving neoadjuvant FLOT during 2024. Outcomes included treatment completion, surgery, RDI, toxicity, pathological response and estimated LBM. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Twelve patients were included (median age 68.6 years; 91.7% male). Eleven (91.6%) completed all four preoperative cycles and proceeded to surgery. Mean RDI was 76.7%. Pre-emptive dose capping was the predominant dose modification strategy, with only one reactive dose reduction. Two grade 3 adverse events occurred. Major pathological response (Mandard grade 1-2) was observed in 2/12 patients (16.7%). Mean estimated LBM declined from 54.3 to 53.4 kg. Greater LBM loss appeared to coincide with poorer clinical outcomes. Conclusions: High treatment completion and progression to surgery were achieved despite reduced RDI. These findings support prospective evaluation of strategies to optimise chemotherapy delivery while maintaining tolerability in routine clinical practice.

Introduction: Perioperative systemic therapy improves outcomes in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, but many patients do not receive postoperative treatment. We examined whether host characteristics and perioperative inflammatory and albumin changes provided information about adjuvant initiation beyond tumour pathology, and whether initiation was associated with survival and disease control. Method: This retrospective cohort included patients undergoing curative-intent resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma at the McGill University Health Centre between 2006 and 2025. Sequential logistic models evaluated pathological characteristics, pre-treatment host variables and perioperative changes in CBC-derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (cNLR) and albumin. Postoperative measurements preceded adjuvant initiation. Nested comparisons used matched complete cases. Day-90 landmark and time-varying Cox models assessed associations between adjuvant initiation and survival. Results: Among 243 patients, 78 (32.1%) did not initiate adjuvant therapy. Adding host variables improved apparent discrimination for initiation beyond pathology (AUC 0.672 to 0.763; P=0.002). Greater perioperative cNLR increase was associated with lower odds of initiation (adjusted OR 0.67 per unit increase in {Delta}log2; cNLR, 95% CI 0.47-0.95), whereas more favourable albumin change was associated with higher odds (OR 1.07 per g/L, 95% CI 1.01-1.13). Neither marker retained a clear independent association when modelled together. Adjuvant initiation by day 90 was associated with longer overall survival (adjusted HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.78) and disease-free survival (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.84), with similar time-varying findings. Conclusion: Host inflammatory and albumin changes added information about adjuvant initiation beyond tumour pathology, and initiation was associated with longer survival. Prospective evaluation should determine whether host-directed perioperative strategies can improve postoperative treatment delivery.

Background: The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index integrates systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and immune function. We evaluated its association with survival in primary lung malignancies. Methods: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 18 September 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Hazard ratios (HRs) were synthesized using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression examined robustness and heterogeneity. Results: Eleven studies contributed 13 cohorts to the overall survival (OS) analysis and 8 cohorts from seven studies to a combined recurrence/progression-free survival (RFS/PFS) analysis. Lower CALLY was associated with poorer OS (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.12; I2=71.6%) and poorer RFS/PFS (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40-1.84; I2=0%). Associations persisted in leave-one-out analyses. No statistically significant subgroup differences were detected. Funnel-plot asymmetry suggested small-study effects for OS and RFS/PFS. Seven studies had moderate and four had high overall risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was rated as low for both OS and RFS/PFS, primarily due to risk of bias, heterogeneity, and endpoint indirectness. Conclusion: Lower CALLY was associated with adverse survival outcomes in the current synthesis. Methodological limitations and variation in biomarker measurement and endpoint definitions restrict interpretation. Prospective validation using standardized measurements and clinically coherent outcomes is needed to establish incremental prognostic value and clinical utility. Keywords: CALLY index; lung cancer; prognosis; overall survival; systematic review; meta-analysis

Clinical records preserve patient findings and final recommendations but rarely capture how specialists select evidence, develop alternative interpretations, disagree, and converge on a management strategy. We describe a dataset derived from ten retrospectively selected, completed cases of histologically confirmed colorectal cancer. For each case, an administrator uploaded de-identified textual clinical records to an authenticated web-based annotation platform. A medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, and radiation oncologist, each with more than ten years of clinical experience, independently linked relevant source fragments to patient-specific interpretations and documented clinical problems, differential hypotheses, uncertainty, and diagnostic and treatment strategies. After the three records were locked, a large language model generated candidate questions for review by the tumour-board chair. The four physicians then discussed each case online; recordings were automatically transcribed and verified by two medical residents. The dataset comprises 30 source-linked specialist reasoning records, 10 verified case-level discussion transcripts, 10 final tumour-board decisions, and associated provenance and quality-control metadata. It supports research on evidence-grounded reasoning, cross-specialty disagreement, multidisciplinary decision-making, and multi-agent clinical decision support.

New prognostic biomarkers for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) may help treatment planning as current staging does not accurately predict survival for many patients. We used a 451 cancer-associated gene panel to assess genomic alterations associated with survival for a cohort of 65 OAC patients who underwent surgical resection without perioperative treatment, reflecting institutional practice at the time. Median age at operation was 72 years, 88% were male, median 32 lymph nodes were removed per patient, and minimum follow-up exceeded 11 years. TNM stages (pTNM, 8th ed.) were 14% stage 1, 14% stage 2, 45% stage 3, and 6% stage 4 (non-locoregional nodal metastases). Copy number changes were common, and somatic mutations were similar to those reported previously. Genetic associations with worse survival included amplification of CCND1 (HR=3.08, p=0.02), EGFR (HR=2.98, p=0.01), loss of ARID2 (HR=2.12, p=0.05), KMT2D (HR=1.99, p=0.07) and missense mutation within RYR1 (HR=2.68, p=0.01). This study identifies candidate genomic prognostic biomarkers in OAC using a cohort treated by surgery alone, enabling assessment of tumour biology independent of the confounding effects of peri-operative systemic therapy and radiotherapy. Several of the identified alterations are potentially targetable, supporting further investigation of genomic profiling to refine prognostication and guide treatment selection.

Computed tomography (CT) interpretation requires recognition of the anatomical level of each slice. Classification may facilitate preprocessing and AI-assisted fracture diagnosis. We developed deep learning models to classify craniofacial CT slices into six anatomical categories. A total of 11,769 images were collected from a multicenter database involving 10 Japanese university hospitals and the public Head-Neck-Radiomics-HN1 dataset. Patients were divided into training (70%) and evaluation (30%) sets. Five CNN architectures were trained from scratch, and hard- and soft-voting ensembles were evaluated. Individual-model accuracy ranged from 94.72% to 96.09%; the hard-voting ensemble achieved 96.46% accuracy (Cohen's k = 0.954). Although performance differed among individual models (Cochran's Q = 99.29, p < 0.001), the ensemble did not significantly outperform EfficientNetV2B1 (McNemar's p = 0.163). Errors occurred mainly between adjacent anatomical regions. Deep learning can classify craniofacial CT slices accurately and may support automated dataset organization and AI-assisted fracture diagnosis. External validation is needed.

Objectives: To determine how strongly clinical referral text, rather than image content, drives the decisions of multimodal large language models (LLMs) differentiating glioma from brain abscess on MRI. Materials and methods: This retrospective single-center study included 60 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted brain MRI examinations (30 gliomas, 30 abscesses; reference-standard diagnosis). One axial slice per case was paired with five referral texts (explicitly inflammatory to explicitly tumor-suggestive) under three prompt instructions and submitted 20 times each to GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and Qwen 3.6 (72,000 answers). The primary outcome was the text-driven span (difference in tumor-call frequency between explicit inflammatory and explicit tumor text). Two blinded radiologists classified the images without text; sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared descriptively. Results: Patients (29 women) had a mean age of 55.8 +/- 16.4 years. With neutral text, models answered tumor in 45-67% of queries (specificity, 0.38-0.78), versus 52% and 60% for radiologists (specificity, 0.77 and 0.63). The text-driven span was 0.79-1.00 (p < 0.001 for all models), whereas confirmed gliomas and abscesses differed by only 0.01-0.10 in three models and 0.25 in Gemini 3.5 Flash. Subtle wording produced at least 83% of the span in three models. An instruction to ignore the text reduced the span to 0.48-0.70 in three models and to 0.04 in Gemini 3.5 Flash, partly through reversion to a tumor default. Model accuracy was 0.52-0.73 versus 0.78 and 0.73 for radiologists. Conclusion: Multimodal LLMs deferred to referral text over imaging evidence in differentiating glioma from brain abscess, and prompt instructions did not reliably correct this.

Objectives To evaluate discrepancies between radiologists and referring physicians in the interpretation of diagnostic probabilities conveyed by common Japanese expressions used in radiology reports. Materials and Methods Fifteen expressions commonly used to convey diagnostic probabilities in radiology reports were selected by five attending radiologists. An anonymous online survey was distributed to 26 radiologists and 33 referring physicians at a single institution. Participants assigned a diagnostic probability (from 0% to 100% in 10% increments) to each expression. Differences in median probabilities between radiologists and referring physicians were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Variability in interpretation was assessed using interquartile range (IQR), with IQR [&ge;] 30% defined as substantial variability. Results All radiologists (26/26) and 97% of referring physicians (32/33) completed the survey. Seven of the 15 expressions showed statistically significant differences in interpretation between radiologists and referring physicians: "c/w" (80% vs. 60%; p = 0.031), the Japanese equivalents of "present" (100% vs. 100%; p = 0.024), "suspect of" (80% vs. 70%; p = 0.007), "possibly" (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.001), "unlikely" (10% vs. 10%; p = 0.022), "cannot be ruled out" (25% vs. 40%; p < 0.001), and "not inconsistent with" (80% vs. 90%; p = 0.008). Substantial variability in interpretation (IQR [&ge;] 30%) was observed for four expressions: "cannot be ruled out" (IQR, 10%-40%), "s/o" (IQR, 60%-90%), "c/w" (IQR, 50%-90%), and "not inconsistent with" (IQR, 70%-100%). Conclusion This study revealed that nearly half of the Japanese expressions commonly used to convey diagnostic probabilities were interpreted differently by radiologists and referring physicians. These discrepancies highlight the need for a standardized lexicon to improve clarity and consistency in radiology reporting.

Purpose To evaluate the external transportability of source-derived probability calibration for chest radiograph deep learning classifiers under distribution shift and determine its dependence on sample size and disease prevalence. Materials and Methods This retrospective secondary computational analysis of public, de-identified radiographic datasets involved no participant contact or new data collection. Cohort sizes were prespecified by availability without prospective power calculation: 106,686 NIH ChestX-ray14 images (29,323 patients; 1992-2015) for development and internal testing, 20,000 CheXpert images (20,000 patients; October 2002-July 2017), and 14,998 VinBigData images (2018-2020) for external testing. ResNet-18, DenseNet-121, and DeiT-Tiny classifiers for cardiomegaly and pleural effusion were trained across four patient fractions and three seeds (36 fits). Calibrators were fitted exclusively on NIH data. Twelve primary external Brier-score contrasts (temperature-scaled versus raw probabilities) were evaluated using paired cluster-bootstrapping with Holm adjustment. Results Temperature scaling reduced Brier scores in nine of 12 primary contrasts but worsened pleural effusion calibration on VinBigData across all architectures (Brier increases: ResNet-18, 0.001460 [95% CI: 0.001347, 0.001568]; DenseNet-121, 0.001193 [95% CI: 0.001109, 0.001274]; DeiT-Tiny, 0.000498 [95% CI: 0.000417, 0.000577]; all adjusted P=.006). Standardizing class weights to NIH prevalence reversed all CheXpert improvements. Although full versus 10% training improved external AUROC across all comparisons, DeiT-Tiny CheXpert pleural effusion Brier score worsened by 0.007039 despite a 0.032466 AUROC gain. At 80% selective image retention, calibrated ensembles retained only 12.3%-17.2% of VinBigData positive pleural effusion examinations. Conclusion Source-fitted calibration is not uniformly transportable across health systems, and discrimination gains do not guarantee calibrated probabilities. External evaluation must simultaneously assess probability reliability, prevalence shifts, and retained-case composition.

Background: This study compared functional and cognitive trajectories in older women treated for early breast cancer with matched women without cancer. Methods: Data were derived from two Dutch cohorts: the CLIMB study (women aged 75 years and older with operable breast cancer) and the ISCOPE study (community-dwelling women aged 75 years and older without cancer). Breast cancer patients were matched 1:2 to controls on age and baseline functional or cognitive status. Functional status was assessed using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS), and cognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Longitudinal changes over 12 months were analyzed using both unadjusted and confounder-adjusted linear mixed models. Results: 168 breast cancer patients and 336 matched breast cancer-free controls were included with a mean age of 80 years. Most breast cancer patients had stage 0-I or II disease and received surgery and/or radiotherapy; 48% received adjuvant endocrine therapy, chemotherapy was rare (<1%). At baseline, both cohorts were comparable in age and functional or cognitive status, although there was a higher comorbidity burden in the control cohort. No significant differences in functional or cognitive decline were observed between the cohorts over 12 months. Conclusions: In older women, early breast cancer and its treatment did not lead to accelerated decline in functional status or cognitive function within the first year compared to matched older women without cancer. These findings suggest that, for relatively fit older patients, breast cancer treatment may not accelerate functional decline in the short term.

Background Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has become the standard of treatment for metastatic melanoma (MM). However, patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are often excluded from clinical trials. Here we analyse patients within the real-world OxCITE cohort receiving ICB treatment for metastatic melanoma, with a focus on MBM, aiming to discern outcomes, prognostic factors and peripheral biomarkers. Methods Patients eligible for ICB treatment were recruited prospectively. Demographic, clinical and radiological data were collected from electronic patient records. Plasma samples were collected prior to the first cycle of treatment for plasma proteomic analysis. Results 307 patients were included, 81 of whom had MBM on commencing ICB. No difference in overall survival between patients with and without brain metastases was noted on multivariable analysis (HR=1.1, 95% CI 0.73-1.6, p=0.68), whereas hepatic metastases were associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p=0.0019). Within the MBM group, steroid treatment (HR=2.5, 95% CI 1.3-5.0, p=0.006) was associated with poor OS, whilst treatment with single agent ICB (HR=1.9, 95% CI 0.86-3.9, p=0.11), symptomatic first presentation of MBM (HR=1.5, 95% CI 0.76-2.8, p=0.25) and anti-seizure drug treatment (HR=1.74, 95% CI 0.89-3.4, p=0.10) were not. Amongst all patients carriage of a BRAF mutation was associated with increased risk of MBM (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.4-4.4, p=0.0007), and increased propensity to new brain metastases on ICB treatment (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.9, p=0.036). Analysis of blood and plasma samples demonstrated that patients with MBM have altered haematological profiles, with raised NLR and increased plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein levels, reinforcing the distinct systemic features of MBM. Conclusions In this real-world cohort of patients receiving ICB for metastatic melanoma, the presence of MBM did not associate with worse OS. Conversely, baseline corticosteroid use was adversely prognostic. Intriguingly, plasma GFAP was significantly elevated in patients with MBM and correlated with the burden of intracranial disease, highlighting a potential role for GFAP as a candidate biomarker for MBM in high-risk surveillance. Our observations indicate the adversely prognostic weight historically attached to M1d disease is no longer applicable in the ICB era.

Background: The organization of pancreatic cancer care may be associated with survival. Using health administrative claims data, we reconstructed the pathway from diagnosis to first-line therapy and examined associations of multidisciplinary team review and treatment at specialized centers with overall survival. Methods: Longitudinal historical cohort study using anonymized health administrative claims data from six Czech health insurance funds, covering approximately 17% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer nationally between 2018 and 2020. Adults with an incident ICD-10 C25 record confirmed by imaging and histopathology were followed from the index date (the date of the first qualifying imaging or histopathological examination) until death, censoring, or 31 December 2021. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression adjusted for age and first-line therapy type. Results: Of 1,255 patients, 920 (73.3%) received first-line therapy and 266 (21.2%) died untreated. Among treated patients, 436 (47.4%) underwent multidisciplinary team review, 335 (36.4%) underwent surgery, and 667 (72.5%) were treated at a complex oncological center. Surgery was associated with longer overall survival than chemotherapy (age-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.32, P < 0.001). Treatment at a complex oncological center was associated with longer overall survival (adjusted HR 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.92, P = 0.004; crude median 532 versus 394 days). Multidisciplinary team review was not significantly associated with overall survival (adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.01, P = 0.073). Conclusions: Treatment at a complex oncological center was associated with longer survival, while fewer than half of patients had a recorded multidisciplinary team review. How care is organized, not only which therapy is delivered, is associated with outcome. The observational design and absence of key clinical covariates limit causal interpretation.

Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is the standard minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer. Conventional multiport robotic surgery is widely applied yet associated with more abdominal trauma and postoperative discomfort. Single-port robotic surgery can further minimize surgical injury. The domestic KangDuo robotic system has been gradually used in urological oncology, but high-level prospective evidence comparing single-port and multiport extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy remains scarce. This trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two surgical approaches. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, 1:1 randomized, non-inferiority trial. Eligible patients diagnosed with cT1c-cT2cN0M0 localized prostate cancer will be randomized to receive either single-port (experimental group) or multiport (control group) extraperitoneal robotic radical prostatectomy using the KangDuo system. All participants will receive standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. The primary endpoint is postoperative positive surgical margin rate. Perioperative parameters, postoperative recovery, medium-term functional recovery and oncological outcomes will be assessed comprehensively. Expected results: We hypothesize that the single-port approach is non-inferior to the multiport approach in terms of oncological radical effect. The single-port technique is expected to provide better minimally invasive benefits, with comparable perioperative safety, urinary/sexual function recovery and mid-term oncological outcomes between groups. Conclusions: This randomized trial will provide high-quality clinical evidence for the application of domestic single-port robotic surgery. The findings will facilitate individualized surgical selection for patients with localized prostate cancer. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2600125669 (http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=2600125669).

Background: Conventional performance metrics do not indicate whether artificial intelligence (AI)-platforms and radiologists are right or wrong on the same examinations, nor whether their non-agreement is more often beneficial or harmful. Objective: To develop, illustrate, and apply directional metrics quantifying non-agreement between radiologists and AI-platforms against a common reference standard, and to adapt a fragility-based framework for quantifying the statistical robustness of these metrics. Methods: We defined Positive Non-Agreement (PNA, AI-platform correct, radiologist incorrect), Negative Non-Agreement (NNA, radiologist correct, AI-platform incorrect), and Net Non-Agreement (NENA, their difference). Metrics were illustrated in three hypothetical scenarios of 1,000 examinations each and applied to three previously published AI-radiologist studies on pulmonary embolism and mammography. Bootstrap confidence intervals were calculated, and a reclassification fragility index (FI) quantified the minimum case reclassification needed to remove statistical support for NENA's direction. Results: In illustration, NENA was positive in two scenarios and negative in one. In the three published studies, NENA ranged from -4.18% to +10.74% and decreased consistently with increasing radiologist experience (junior residents, +6.27%; consultants, +1.45%), a gradient driven primarily by declining PNA with modest increase in NNA. The reclassification FI was defined for all three illustrative scenarios (range, 0.10%-1.70%) and for six of the seven comparisons from these studies (range, 0.34%-4.31%), but not for the weakest comparison, whose confidence interval for NENA included zero. Conclusions: PNA, NNA, and NENA provide a directional, case-level complement to conventional performance metrics for AI-radiologist non-agreement. The accompanying reclassification FI offers a statistically grounded, generalizable method for quantifying their robustness.

Rationale: Conventional CT-derived pulmonary vascular metrics quantify vascular pruning but do not assess the spatial heterogeneity of vascular architecture. In COPD, peripheral microvascular pruning coexists with compensatory central vessel dilation, paradoxically preserving total vessel volume while reducing effective vascular penetration into lung parenchyma. Objectives: To develop and evaluate Vascular Proximity Coverage (VPC), a distance-based CT biomarker quantifying the spatial efficiency of pulmonary vascular distribution. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 7,881 COPDGene participants [PHASE] with complete vascular segmentations. VPC was estimated by integrating the area under the cumulative lung tissue coverage curve at distances of 0-10 mm from segmented vessel voxels. Multivariable models assessed associations with lung function, six-minute walk distance (6MWD), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, mMRC dyspnea score, and all-cause mortality over a median follow-up of [10.8] years, adjusting for demographics, smoking, emphysema, scanner type, and BV5. The cohort was stratified at median BV5 and VPC into concordant (high/high, low/low) and discordant (high-BV5/low-VPC, low-BV5/high-VPC) vascular phenotypes. Results: VPC declined across disease severity (5.82 {+/-} 0.50 [UNITS] in non-smokers to 5.21 {+/-} 0.64 in GOLD 4; p < 0.001). Among spirometrically normal smokers, current smokers had lower VPC than former smokers (5.31 vs. 5.68; p < 0.001). Each standard deviation decrease in VPC was independently associated with reduced 6MWD ({beta} = -16.8 m, 95% CI: -19.5 to -14.0), worse SGRQ ({beta} = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.4 to 2.4), and greater dyspnea (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.08; all p < 0.001). The lowest VPC quartile was associated with 38% higher mortality than the reference quartile (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.62; p < 0.001). The high-BV5/low-VPC phenotype showed 24% higher mortality than high-BV5/high-VPC (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.42; p = 0.002) despite preserved vessel volume. Conclusions: VPC captures spatial heterogeneity of vascular architecture independent of vessel volume, is reduced in smokers without airflow obstruction, and identifies excess mortality risk among individuals whose total vessel volume appears preserved.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) facilitates de-escalation of breast and axillary treatment in breast cancer, but pathological responses may differ between the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes. Understanding differential response is crucial for de-escalation strategies. Methods: This single university hospital retrospective study analysed operable breast cancers (cT1-cT3, cN0-cN3) treated with NACT (January 2013-November 2020). Two-tailed Fishers exact test or the Chi-squared test (for 2x2 comparisons) analysed concordance between breast and axillary pathological responses; Cox proportional hazards regression ascertained predictors of distant recurrence and survival; and logistic regression ascertained predictors of complete axillary response. Results: Among 413 patients (cN0=229; cN+=184) with a median age of 51, pathological response concordance between the breast and axilla was 81% (both pCR, 22.2%; concurrent residual disease, 58.8%). The cN0 group had a significantly higher ypN0 rate in breast pCR versus non-pCR (97.1% vs 80.8%, p<0.001). cN+ had axillary pCR concordant with breast pCR, compared to only 16.5% with residual breast disease. Breast pCR was the most significant predictor of axillary pCR (OR=11.6, p<0.001). Axillary pCR was highest in ER-/HER2+(66.7%) and triple-negative(46.9%) subtypes. Residual axillary disease was independently associated with the worst breast cancer-specific (HR=7.13, p=0.006) and overall Survival (HR=3.32, p=0.029). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a trend towards worse survival outcomes with axillary residual disease, even with a breast pCR. Conclusions: In this limited series, breast pCR predicts axillary pCR in cN0 and cN+, particularly in HER2-positives and triple-negatives, supporting axillary de-escalation strategies in selected patients stratified by careful assessment of disease at the end of NACT.